韩国被窝网剧情介绍:

327. We find that the Wire Act, the Travel Act, and the IGBA are “measures … necessary to protect public morals or to maintain public order”, within the meaning of paragraph （a） of Article ⅩⅣ of the GATS.
369.Thus, our conclusion—that the Panel did not err in finding that the United States has not shown that its measures satisfy the requirements of the chapeau—relates solely to the possibility that the IHA exempts only domestic suppliers of remote betting services for horse racing from the prohibitions in the Wire Act, the Travel Act, and the IGBA. In contrast, the Panel's overall conclusion under the chapeau was broader in scope. As a result of our reversal of one of the two findings on which the Panel relied for its conclusion in paragraph 6.607 of the Panel Report, we must modify that conclusion. We find, rather, that the United States has not demonstrated that—in the light of the existence of the IHA—the Wire Act, the Travel Act, and the IGBA are applied consistently with the requirements of the chapeau. Put another way, we uphold the Panel, but only in part.